Egypt's Draft Constitution Part TWO: The Egyptian Media Debate Over Religion And State



On December 1, 2012, Egyptian President Muhammad Mursi announced that Egypt's new constitution would be put to referendum on December 15. The previous report in this series[1] reviewed Egypt's past constitutions and the events surrounding the establishment of the Constituent Assembly, and presented the articles of the draft constitution pertaining to the status of religion in Egypt.

The present report is a detailed review of the debate and controversy over each of these articles.

The Debate Regarding Article 1

Egypt - An "Egyptian Nation" Or "Part Of The Arab And Islamic Nation?"

In the 1971 constitution, Article 1 was phrased as follows: "The Arab Republic of Egypt is a state with a democratic system, based on citizenship, and the Egyptian people are a part of the Arab nation working toward achieving its comprehensive unity." This article was changed in the current draft constitution, and now reads: "The Arab Republic of Egypt is an independent sovereign state, united and indivisible, its system democratic. The Egyptian people are part of the Arab and Islamic nations, proud of belonging to the Nile Valley and Africa and of its Asian reach, a positive participant in human civilization."[2]

This amendment is an intimation of the Islamization of the constitution. The proposal to change the wording to define the Egyptian people as part of the Islamic, and not merely the Arab, nation appears in an article written by Salafi Sheikh Yasser Burhami, one of the leaders and founders of the Al-Da'wa Al-Salafiyya movement. He wrote that this addition would "affirm the Egyptian people's belonging to both the Arab and the Islamic nation, which is enshrined in the hearts of all Egyptians since the Islamic conquest of Egypt and to this day..."[3]

A dissenting opinion was heard in the public discourse, though not in the Constituent Assembly. In a series of articles published in the Egyptian daily Al-Ahram, columnist Taha 'Abd Al-'Alim called to define Egypt as an "Egyptian nation," not as Arab or Islamic: "Those who criticize the [notion] of upholding the national Egyptian identity are the ones who support Arab identity, pan-Arabism, and Arab unity... [and also] the ones who support Islamic identity, the Caliphate and Islamic unity, who would like [to restore] the Islamic Caliphate state... and those who support Westernization and globalization... In actuality, the Egyptian nation is an existing fact and a tangible reality, whereas... the call for Arab unity is a possible future enterprise... and the call for Islamic unity is a [utopian] Salafi enterprise striving to establish a global religious Caliphate state, which would subsume different and conflicting nationalities, languages, and interests."[4]

"The Writing Of The Constitution"[5]

Egypt - A "Civil State"?

The previous Egyptian constitutions did not define Egypt as a civil state. This amendment was the aspiration of liberal-secular circles and Copts, who view it as a guarantee that the Islamic shari'a will not be implemented, that religion will be separate from politics, and that religious minorities will enjoy equal rights. As early as August 2011, the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) attempted to ensure that Egypt's definition as a civil state would be anchored in the constitution, as evident in the "Document of Constitutional Principles" written by Dr. 'Ali Al-Silmi, then-deputy prime minister for political affairs and democratization.[6] However, the document aroused great public opposition and sparked violent demonstrations, and it was shelved when the government was disbanded and a new government, headed by Kamal Al-Ganzouri, was established. With the establishment of a Constituent Assembly with an Islamic majority, the hopes of the liberals that Egypt would be defined as a civil state were shattered.

It should be stressed that although most Islamic streams use the term "civil state" in order to appear liberal in Western eyes, they express reservations about including it in the constitution. The Salafis are adamantly against the addition of the word "civil" per se to the constitution, owing to its liberal-secularist connotations. The Al-Nour Party even threatened not to vote for the constitution in the referendum if this word were included, making it clear that it would accept the addition only with an accompanying explanation that the word was used to mean "non-military."[7] The spokesman of the Al-Gama'a Al-Islamiyya party said that his party would not object to the word "civil" if the constitution explicitly explained that it is taken to mean "non-theocratic."[8]

The Muslim Brotherhood (MB) adopted a middle-of-the-road solution with regard to the issue of the civil state. For several years, they have espoused the slogan "a civil state with an Islamic source of authority," which also appears in the platform of their political party.[9] Consequently, they could not object to the use of the concept in the constitution,[10] but they expressed their reservations, saying that it had gained a bad reputation in public opinion because it had come to denote the secularization of the state and a war against religion, and that the concept of "civil" does not appear in any other constitution in the world.[11]

Al-Azhar opposed the use of the word "civil" in the constitution because it could be interpreted in a myriad of ways, and added that the meaning of the term as they understand it is already expressed in the constitution, so there is no need to include the explicit term. A spokesman for Al-Azhar's representatives in the Constituent Assembly explained that Al-Azhar considers a civil state to mean "a national, constitutional, democratic, and modern state, which guarantees the Islamic shari'a and whose source of authority is Al-Azhar."[12] It was reported in the Egyptian media that the Sheikh of Al-Azhar had reached a compromise with the Salafis, according to which the expression "Egypt as a civil state" would not appear in the constitution and the Salafis, in return, would abandon their demand to amend Article 2.[13]

The Controversy Over Article 2

Article 2 of the constitution, which is considered the main article to define the status of religion in Egypt, remains as it was in the previous constitution: "Islam is the state religion [of Egypt] and Arabic is the official language. The principles of Islamic shari'a are the main source of legislation." The debate with regard to this article rocked the Constituent Assembly, and the decision to leave it unchanged, without deletion of the word "principles," as the Salafis had demanded, was the result of MB efforts to allay the fears of many - in Egypt and in the West - that the MB rule in Egypt would lead to the Islamization of the country. The controversy sharpened the differences between the liberal-secular and the Islamic streams in Egypt, and also among the different Islamic streams, with regard to the relation between religion and state.

The Minority Opinion: Abolish Article 2

Only a few called to abolish Article 2 altogether, and this demand did not come to the fore in the Constituent Assembly. The Copts and the liberals in the assembly preferred to concentrate their efforts on struggles more likely to succeed, such as the struggle to leave the article as it is and prevent it from being amended according to the wishes of the Islamic majority in the assembly.

However, calls to abolish the article were heard in the Egyptian media. Egyptian intellectual 'Abd Al-Mu'ti Higazi, for example, wrote: "The constitution [should] recognize only common rights, which pertain equally to all citizens... Article [2] is not a divine revelation, but bida' [a prohibited innovation that deviates from religious precepts], which is foreign to us and was not recognized in any of our constitutions, except for the patchwork constitution that we inherited from the days of Mubarak and Sadat... When [Islamic factions] say that the shari'a is the main source for legislation, they are bringing together two parallel threads that could never meet, for the shari'a pertains to Muslims alone, whereas legislation is the basic right of all Egyptians, since the people is the source of all authorities. How can an Egyptian who is not Muslim accept this article? In fact, how can any enlightened Egyptian [accept it], be he Muslim or non-Muslim?..."[14]

The coordinator of the Egyptians Against Religious Discrimination organization, Muhammad Mounir Mugahid, likewise called to abolish Article 2, as it appeared in the 1971 constitution, because it "provides constitutional sanction for discriminating between citizens on a religious basis." He proposed an alternative phrasing: "Egyptian society is founded upon citizen rights, upon honoring pluralism and dissimilarity, and upon equality between citizens. Arabic is the official language of the state and Islam is the religion of the majority of its people. The intentions of Islam stand alongside the values endorsed by humanity [at large]. The conventions on human rights are a main source of legislation..."[15]

The Salafi Approach: Amending Article 2 To Mandate Full Implementation Of Shari'a Law, Including Koranic Punishments

The Salafi parties Al-Asala and Al-Nour, as well as the Al-Gama'a Al-Islamiyya movement, advocate the full and literal implementation of the laws of the Islamic shari'a, including Koranic punishments such as cutting off the hands of thieves, stoning adulterers, and flogging alcohol imbibers - a radical approach that contravenes the international conventions on human and citizen rights. The proponents of this approach made two main suggestions for amending Article 2:

The first suggestion, typical of Al-Gama'a Al-Islamiyya and Al-Asala, is to omit the word "principles" from the article, so that it reads: "The Islamic Sharia [rather than the principles of the Islamic shari'a] is the main source of legislation." Al-Asala chairman Dr. 'Adel Al-'Afifi even ruled that leaving the word "principles" in place would be an act of heresy. He wrote in the Egyptian Islamic daily Al-Misriyyoun: "Is it permissible to vote for a constitution that makes the shari'a only a main source of legislation - which means that there can be other sources of legislation alongside Allah's shari'a, with equal weight? Is it conceivable that some of the directives of the shari'a will be discarded, and replaced with other directives, anchored in man-made laws? Can we cheat in implementing the shari'a by adding the word 'principles'...? There is no disagreement among religious scholars that whoever adopts another legislator in addition to Allah the Almighty and [grants him the authority] to judge, alongside the shari'a of Allah the Almighty, is an infidel..."[16]

The second Salafi suggestion, promoted by the Al-Nour party, was to replace the word "principles" with the word "directives," so that the article reads: "The directives [emphasis ours] of the Islamic Sharia [rather than the principles of the Islamic shari'a] are the main source of legislation." This means that not only the general spirit or the general principles of the shari'a will be respected, but that all of its directives will be implemented.[17] Al-Nour party spokesman, Yusri Hammad, explained: "The Islamic shari'a includes the absolute principles and the shari'a directives pertaining to all public affairs and all aspects of life, without neglecting even the smallest detail, from the definition of the tenets of the Islamic faith and the essence of belief and worship, to laws pertaining to all aspects of life - from laws on [issues of] family, divorce, marriage, custody, childrearing and inheritance, to laws on governance, justice, shura and the handling of state affairs, and also laws on commerce, buying and selling, possession, and maintaining and developing capital. Moreover, [the shari'a] regulates the state's relations with other states - what is called international relations - and the rules of war and peace according to Islam. It also regulates the relations among the people within the state.

"Then there is the [shar'ic] penal code, which comes to protect society from misconduct by [some people], which undermines these [religious] principles... The punishment for stealing applies to the well-fed who intimidated simple folk who work hard all day to earn a few pennies to feed their families. The punishment for robbery applies to someone who took up a weapon... to rob peaceful passersby, mug women, or kill children in a peace-loving society that seeks security. The punishment for adultery applies to someone who seduces a young girl who could be your daughter or sister. The [shar'ic punishments] are a fence protecting all those living on Egyptian soil, and are not used against honorable and peaceful people who respect the public's safety, property and honor..."[18]

The Middle Way: Leaving Article 2 Unchanged

This approach, which was insistently advocated by the Sheikh of Al-Azhar, Dr. Ahmad Al-Tayyeb, was the most common and dominant of the three. Al-Tayyeb explained his approach in a press conference: "[Article 2, in its existing form], is a message to the Egyptian legislator that he must base the Egyptian laws, in all branches of legislation, upon the laws of the Islamic shari'a and upon the familiar shar'ic schools of thought, or else base them upon the international traditions of legislation, as long as the latter do not contravene the shari'a and serve the public interest. The Supreme Constitutional Court is the only body authorized to assess whether laws are in keeping with the constitution and to abolish any legal clause that contravenes the Islamic shari'a..."[19]

This wasati (middle way) approach aims to maintain the status quo and the delicate balance between the polarized sectors of Egyptian society, namely between those who call to abolish Article 2 altogether and the Salafis who wish to anchor the codification of the shari'a in the constitution. This compromise was endorsed not only by Al-Azhar but also by the Coptic Church and by the majority of liberal-secularists, who recognized the unlikelihood of abolishing the article altogether and preferred the option of leaving it as it is to the option of having it rephrased in more extremist terms. Among those who wished to leave the article unchanged was also the MB, on the grounds that changing it could lead to fitna (civil war) and that the controversy over it could tear the Constituent Assembly apart.[20] In its present role as the ruling force in Egypt, the MB also preferred to leave Article 2 intact in order to calm the situation in the country and allay concerns worldwide regarding the possible Islamization of Egypt under its rule.

This approach was expressed in an article by Egyptian intellectual Fahmi Huweidi, who belongs to the wasati stream. He wrote: "[In drafting its new constitution, post-revolutionary Tunisia] made do with establishing Islam as the state religion, and steered clear of the question of the shari'a. The head of the Al-Nahda movement, Sheikh Rashed Al-Ghanoushi, explained that this phrasing was sufficient indication of the state's identity and religious affiliation. He added that the [Al-Nahda] movement sensed that the issue of the shari'a was a delicate one with [various Tunisian] elites, and therefore decided not to mention it [in the constitution], in order to avoid controversy and maintain national unity.

"Al-Ghanoushi was reasonable and responsible in taking this political [decision]. He read the reality well, and gave priority to the unity of the homeland. In contrast, our brothers [in Egypt] who insist on removing the word 'principles' [from Article 2] and replacing it with the word 'directives' [namely the Salafis] are thinking like preachers who are living in the past and have lost touch with reality and with the homeland. The difference between the two approaches is the difference between open-mindedness and intelligence [on the one hand] and blind narrow-mindedness [on the other]. Practically speaking, the principles [of shari'a], in the sense of its overarching intentions, are more important than its 'directives,' in the sense of its details... Closed-minded secularism is no different from its equivalent in the Islamic camp... There is no difference between one who insists on imposing the directives of the shari'a and one who insists on erasing [Egypt's] Islamic identity."[21]

The MB, which advocated leaving Article 2 unchanged, and opposed the November 2012 protests held by Salafis in demand to implement the shari'a, was accused by many of abandoning the shari'a. The movement defended its stance in a communiqué posted on its official website: "For us, the shari'a is a complete way of life... The penal code of the shari'a is just and precise, for punishments are [only] applied after all the conditions for proving [the perpetrator's guilt] are met. [However,] society must first of all be prepared for understanding and accepting the shari'a, and must be led gradually to its practical implementation. [We] must [first] implement the general intentions [of the shari'a], which society is in need of, [by] observing religion and protecting life, reason, capital and property, so as to ensure the material and mental security of society."

The communiqué clarifies the MB's understanding of the expression 'principles of the shari'a': "The shari'a is based on a system of fundamental principles that are unique to it, in contrast to all man-made laws: leniency rather than severity; removing [the threat of] injustice and harm from individuals and society; placing the public good above the good of the individual and the avoidance of harm over the making of profit; a balance between the rights of the individual and of society; and other well-known shar'ic principles. Basing the laws [of the state on these principles] guarantees the security, welfare, and stability of society... The Islamic shari'a is the most important issue we deal with and aim to inculcate in society. Our brothers sacrificed their lives and suffered in jail and detention for many decades for the sake of this [goal], so we cannot conceivably give up the demand for this glorious shari'a... The MB always strove to grant the shari'a its rightful status in the constitution, so as to enable parliament to codify the laws of the Islamic shari'a, with Allah's help..."[22]

Woman carrying a placard saying: "The Shari'a Is Our Constitution"[23]

Article 219: An Opening For The Implementation Of Shari'a

Article 219 was added to the constitution as a clarification of Article 2 in order to satisfy the Salafis. It states: "[The expression] 'principles of Islamic shari'a' refers to the general methods of juridical argumentation, to fundamental juridical rules and principles, and to the [written] sources recognized by the Sunni juridical schools." The purpose of this article is to avoid narrow interpretations of Article 2, such as the liberal interpretation, according to which the principles of shari'a are synonymous with universal principles of freedom, justice, and equality, or the interpretation given to it by the Supreme Constitutional Court in 1996, according to which future (but not existing) legislation must conform only to the parts of shari'a whose validity is absolute and that are not disputed among different schools in Islam. Article 219, in contrast, gives Article 2 a broader reading, which would enable the implementation of a larger part of the shari'a and requiring legislation to conform to the principles of Sunni law - although it is unclear how broad the interpretation will actually be. The MB clarified that the Article 219 refers to "everything stated in the Koran and proper Sunna" and "the foundations stemming from all the methods of juridical argumentation that are undisputed and fulfill the intentions of the shari'a," and that the expression "sources" refers to "the Koran, Sunna, ijma', and qiyas."[24]

Article 219 is meant to enable the MB to counter the Salafi claim that it forewent the implementation of the shari'a by objecting to amending Article 2, since Article 219 opens the door to the codification of the shari'a. Out of consideration for liberal circles, this article was placed toward the end of the constitution, and not immediately following Article 2, in order to indicate that it is of lesser importance. Therefore, it is still unclear how this article will influence legislation in practice.

The addition of this article was acceptable to the Al-Nour party, which is represented in the Constituent Assembly, but it did not satisfy all the Salafis. Thousands took to Al-Tahrir Square in protests organized by Al-Gama'a Al-Islamiyya and the Salafi Front on three Fridays in November 2012, protesting against Article 2 and demanding to implement the shari'a.[25]

Article 219 was also criticized by liberals, Copts and Shi'ites, who see it as an opening for discrimination against all those who are not Sunni Muslims. For example, recently elected Coptic Patriarch Tawadros II said that, while he accepted Article 2, Article 219 is "a catastrophe that transforms Egypt from a civil state to the complete opposite."[26] Dr. Khaled Fahmi, head of the History Department at the American University in Cairo, wrote on his Facebook page that Article 219 discriminates against the Shi'ite school of Islam and therefore violates the rights of Egypt's Shi'ite citizens.[27]

Muhammad Al-Sayyed Salim, a political science lecturer at the University of Cairo, wrote in Al-Ahram: "It is unclear why the two articles [2 and 219] were not placed together... Was the idea to hide Article 219 by putting it at the end? We know that there is deep controversy among religious scholars of the various Sunni streams and schools of thought... regarding those fundamental juridical principles and sources [mentioned in Article 219], especially when it comes to political matters, chief among them the system of government. Can we [really] know what the 'fundamental juridical rules and principles' and the 'general methods of juridical argumentation' [say] about [the issues of] shura or the status of women and non-Muslims in the political sphere or about the international relations of an Islamic state? There are deep disagreements between [different] juridical schools of thought about these issues, and deciding [issues] based on controversial [opinions] opens the door to interpretations by [Al-Azhar's] Supreme Council of Clerics [a body disbanded by Gamal 'Abd Al-Nasser in the 1960s and reestablished after the 2011 revolution], establishing them as the rulers of society, like the Rule of the Jurisprudent [in Iran]..."[28]

It must be noted that Article 222 of the draft constitution states that laws legislated in the past will stay in effect, but can be amended to conform to the new constitution. This means that the Islamic camp may demand the revision of existing laws in accordance with Article 219.

Article 3: Religious Tolerance Only Towards Members Of The Monotheistic Faiths

Article 3 states: "The canon principles of Egyptian Christians and Jews are the main source of legislation for their personal status laws, their religious affairs, and the selection of their spiritual leaders."[29] Most Salafi streams objected to the addition of this article, on grounds that the Islamic shari'a guarantees minority rights anyway, and therefore, since the shari'a is defined as the main source of legislation, there is no need for a separate clause ensuring their rights.[30] Some even objected to the mention of the word "Jews" in the constitution, claiming it might lead to an increase in the number of Jews in Egypt and to espionage.[31]

The MB and Al-Azhar, on the other hand, were willing to accept the addition, provided that it would apply only to monotheistic religions and not to non-Muslims in general, so as to exclude groups they consider deviant, such as the Baha'is, Buddhists, Qadianis, and Quranists.[32] This article was meant to create the impression of tolerance and to appease Copts who claim that Article 2 could serve as a basis for their discrimination.

The Coptic Church indeed accepted the article,[33] but within the Coptic community in Egypt there were those who objected to it, on the grounds that it is a trap meant to get Copts to agree to Article 2 while enabling the Muslims to boast of their tolerance towards the Copts. They added that Article 3 would not really end the suffering of Copts so long as there was no equality in rights and duties among all citizens, due to the status of Islam as the state religion and of the shari'a as the primary source of legislation.[34] Some in the Coptic community also explained that they did not want separate cultural rights, but only to be equal citizens and equal in the eyes of the law.[35] Another argument was that Church laws are even more restrictive than Islamic law, especially in the domains of inheritance, as well as the law banning divorce, except in cases of adultery.[36]

Article 4: The Status Of Al-Azhar

Article 4 defines Al-Azhar as "an encompassing independent Islamic institution, with exclusive autonomy over its own affairs, responsible for preaching Islam, [and teaching] theology and the Arabic language in Egypt and the world. Al-Azhar Senior Scholars are to be consulted in matters pertaining to Islamic law. The post of Al-Azhar Grand Sheikh is independent and [he] cannot be dismissed. The method of appointing the Grand Sheikh from among members of the [Supreme Council of Clerics] is to be determined by law. The State shall ensure sufficient funds for Al-Azhar to achieve its objectives. All of the above is subject to law regulations." [37]

This article reflects the consensus regarding Al-Azhar's status in Egypt, and aims to establish that Al-Azhar is no longer dependent on the regime and that its rulings shall no longer be influenced by political considerations, after previous regimes used it to grant religious sanction to their policies. The article also reflects the considerable influence of the MB on the constitution's language, since a similar suggestion to reestablish the Supreme Council of Clerics, select the Sheikh of Al-Azhar from among the members of this body, and consult it on matters of Islamic shari'a appeared in the MB party's platform.[38]

This article also reflects an attempt to find common ground that would please both the Salafis and those with more liberal leanings. At a certain point, the Salafis agreed with the Sheikh of Al-Azhar that they would remove their objection to the expression "principles of shari'a" in Article 2, provided that Al-Azhar (rather that the Supreme Constitutional Court) would be granted the sole authority to interpret "the principles of shari'a."[39] However, this demand sparked criticism among elements demanding the separation of religion and state, since it means vesting a religious body with authority to influence legislation.[40] This criticism stems from their fear of Egypt becoming a religious state, and the fear of a future Salafi takeover of Al-Azhar and the subsequent radical Islamist interpretation of "the principles of shari'a."[41]

Tension between Al-Azhar and the Salafis peaked when the Sheikh of Al-Azhar insisted that Article 2 remain as it was, i.e., without an addition granting Al-Azhar the sole authority to interpret "the principles of shari'a." The Salafi parties - Al-Nour, Al-Asala, and the party of Al-Gama'a Al-Islamiyya - asked to reopen discussion on Article 2, and called on the Sheikh of Al-Azhar to resign, claiming that he had backed down from what had been previously agreed in the Constituent Assembly and that he was undermining their efforts to defend the shari'a.[42] Ultimately, Al-Azhar was defined as a body that "must be consulted on matters of Islamic shari'a," meaning that Al-Azhar's opinion should be sought in such matters, but would not be binding. Article 175 stipulates that the Supreme Constitutional Court has sole authority to interpret laws and determine whether they conform to the constitution.

Article 5: Sovereignty Of The People Or Sovereignty Of God

Article 5 determines that "sovereignty is for the people; it is they who exercise and protect it, and safeguard national unity, and they are the source of authority, in the manner specified in the constitution." [43] This article is identical to Article 3 in the previous constitution, despite the Salafi pressure to replace "sovereignty is for the people" with "sovereignty is for God." Dr. Younis Makhyoun, an official in the Salafi Al-Nour party and its representative in the Constituent Assembly, explained the benefit of the Salafi demand, as he saw it: "The idea of the sovereignty of Allah prevents the sovereignty of humans [in the name of the religion]. [This way] no one can speak for Allah or claim he is acting on His behalf..." Makhyoun added that the amendment his party proposed was meant to prevent a religious theocracy ruled by a person or a body seeking to govern by divine decree.[44]

Most members of the Constituent Assembly, including from the MB, objected to this proposal, which also sparked criticism among the public. For example, columnist Dr. Osama Al-Ghazali Harb wrote: "There is no room for such a proposal. Sovereignty is a political and legal term... relating to the supreme independent rule of the state, meaning a specific area and a specific people. This rule is not in the hands of a single ruler or tyrant, or a minority with a monopoly, [so as to] strengthen the spirit of democracy and defend society from the evils of dictatorship and tyranny.

"The concept of 'sovereignty' bears no relation to religion. Moreover, forcefully inserting God's name into the concept [of sovereignty] is a mistake that must not be made, just as the term 'sovereignty' does not appear in the Koran. The most important and logical reason for this is that relations between man and Allah are much wider, deeper, and more lofty than those between ruler and subjects. Relations between the creator and his creations transcend the affinity to a particular country..."[45]

The Controversy Over Article 6

Egypt - A "Democratic State" Or A "Shura State"?

The first part of Article 6 determines that "the political system is based on the principles of democracy and shura; citizenship, under which all citizens are equal in rights and duties; multi-party pluralism; peaceful transfer of power; separation of powers and the balance between them; the rule of law, and respect for human rights and freedoms - all as elaborated in the constitution."[46]

The language of this article reflects an attempt to please the Salafis, who pressed for avoiding the use of the term "democratic regime" and for replacing it with the term shura (an Islamic principle requiring the ruler to consult with authoritative advisors, and which, according to some Muslims, proves that the modern concept of parliament comes from Islam[47]). At the same time, this language aims to please the liberals, who objected to the reference to shura.[48] The inclusion of both terms, suggested by the MB, represents a compromise between the Salafi and liberal approaches. The legal advisor for the MB party, Dr. Ahmed Abu Baraka, said that "shura means democracy... and there is no reason to avoid adding the term because it does not detract from the meaning of democracy in any way or from the principles of the people's sovereignty and the rule of law."[49]

In the eyes of the Salafis, the addition of "shura" alongside "democracy" distinguishes Egyptian democracy, which conforms to Muslim traditions, from permissive Western-style democracy. The Al-Nour party spokesman clarified that shura is "an Islamic synonym for the Western word 'democracy.' [The latter term] poses many dangers to Egypt, since, in its Western sense, it means the absolute sovereignty of the majority's will, including... laxness regarding the tenets of the faith and moral values, which has led to the legalization of gay marriage in Western countries, [for example]. Can we accept that in Egypt? The democracy we want involves freedoms and shura, as long as they do not contravene a divine text..."[50]

The addition of the term shura sparked concern in secular and liberal circles. Former People's Assembly member 'Omar Al-Hamzawi, who withdrew from the Constituent Assembly in protest over its Islamic majority, wrote: "Democracy does not stand in contradiction to [the notion of] shura in terms of participation, but rather subsumes it as a basic component and addresses meanings and mechanisms larger than it. I see no justification for the phrasing proposed [by the Al-Nour party]. We can make do with the term "democratic," with [the addition] of "civil," meaning equal rights without discrimination and transfer of power among elected citizens who manage public affairs..."[51]

And indeed, the rest of Article 6 comes to clarify that the inclusion of the term shura does not imply theocratic rule, but rather a rule that leans on the principle of citizenship - meaning equal rights and duties among citizens without discrimination on the basis of religion, as well as a rule based on party pluralism, the separation of the powers, the rule of law, respecting human rights, and peaceful transfer of power.

Revoking The Ban On Establishing Religious Parties

The second part of Article 6 determines that "no political party shall be formed that discriminates on the basis of gender, origin or religion." This clause replaces an amendment made by Mubarak to Article 5 of the 1971 constitution, which used much stronger language, prohibiting any political activity or parties based on religion, on a religious source of authority, or on discrimination.

The Al-Nour party submitted a request to the Constituent Assembly to remove the ban on establishing religious parties, claiming that it contravened Article 2 of the constitution. The MB party supported Al-Nour's request, claiming that Mubarak had added the prohibition solely to prevent the MB itself from establishing a party.[52] On the other hand, the head of the left wing Al-Tagammu' party, Dr. Rif'at Sa'id, objected to canceling the ban on establishing religious parties, on the grounds that no party can claim that its platform represents Islam, even if it defines itself as having an Islamic source of authority, since the various parties have different views of Islam. He warned that removing the ban could open a Pandora's box of sectarianism in Egypt.[53]

Islamists in the Constituent Assembly[54]

Article 10: Women's Status

Article 10, pertaining to women's status, states: "The family is the basis of the society and is founded on religion, morality, and patriotism. The State is keen to preserve the genuine character of the Egyptian family, its cohesion and stability, and to protect its moral values, all as regulated by law. The State shall ensure maternal and child health services free of charge, and enable the reconciliation between a woman's duties to her family and to her work. The State shall provide special care and protection to female breadwinners, divorced women, and widows." [55]

An earlier version of this clause mentioned the state's obligation to take all steps to establish gender equality in politics, culture, the economy, society, and other areas, without violating Islamic shari'a. However, despite being included in the previous constitution, this phrasing sparked outrage among women's rights and human rights activists. They claimed these limitations could increase gender discrimination in Egypt, since they might lead, for example, to lowering the marriage age for girls, separating boys and girls in school, forcing female students to wear head scarves, permitting female circumcision, and forbidding women to run for president.[56] The Salafis, for their part, were unwilling to include an article on gender equality without the caveat regarding conformity with the principles of shari'a. This eventually led to the elimination of this clause from the third draft of the constitution altogether. It should be mentioned that Article 33 states that citizens are equal in the eyes of the law without discrimination (though, unlike the previous constitution, it does not explicitly mention gender discrimination). In addition, Article 73 outlaws the "sex trade." However, the article from the 1971 constitution ensuring a minimal representation of women in parliament was removed.

"National Front for Egyptian Women: The women of Egypt call for fair treatment in the constitution."[57]

In an article in the independent Egyptian daily Al-Shurouq, women's rights activist 'Izza Kamel wrote that the disappointing language of the article on women's status does not necessarily stem from the Islamic character of the Constituent Assembly, but rather from the patriarchal character of Egyptian society as a whole: "Patriarchal thought still controls [all of] us and the mentality of most members of the [Constituent] Assembly, which, in turn, besieges the woman with legal, social and religious restrictions, and pushes her to the margins of society. This patriarchal thought is not related to the fundamentalists' recent rise to power; it has been ongoing for centuries… Breaking free of the cycle of backwardness in which our Egyptian and Arab society is stuck - which marginalizes women and excludes them, and violates their most fundamental rights as citizens and human being - can only be achieved by striking at the foundations of the patriarchal system, which is not confined to the family, but is a phenomenon that applies to society as a whole: the family, the tribe, and the religious, cultural, societal and political state institutions."[58]

It should be mentioned that Salafi members of the Constituent Assembly wanted the constitution to specify that not only women's freedoms but most freedoms must conform to the Islamic shari'a, including the freedoms of expression, congregation, and the press, and demanded not to define them as absolute freedoms.[59] This demand was not met in full, but Article 81 determines that "rights and freedoms shall be practiced in a manner not conflicting with the principles pertaining to State and society included in Part I of this Constitution,"[60] which could be interpreted to mean that these freedoms must conform to the principles of Islamic shari'a as determined by Article 2.

Article 43: Restricting Freedom Of Worship

Article 43 states: "Freedom of belief is an inviolable right, and the state shall guarantee the freedom to practice religious rites and to establish places of worship for the divine religions." This article, like its equivalent in the previous constitution (Article 46), guarantees freedom of belief. However, the demand of human rights groups to specify that freedom of belief is "absolute" - which would include the freedom to convert from one religion to the other, as well as the freedom to practice non-monotheistic religions - was rejected. Yasser Burhami, one of the founders of the Al-Da'wa Al-Salafiyya movement, for example, explained that "absolute freedom of belief... includes devil and idol worship and heresy [ridha] against Islam, which would undoubtedly place society in grave danger."[61]

Unlike the article dealing with freedom of belief and worship in the previous constitution, this one restricts "the freedom to practice religious rites" to members of the "divine" (i.e. monotheistic) faiths. Former People's Assembly member 'Omar Al-Hamzawi criticized this article: "Freedom of belief is severely restricted in the second sentence [of the article]... since freedom of belief is organically tied to the freedom to practice religious rites, which in turn involves the freedom to establish houses of worship, which must not be restricted in a democratic constitution to members of monotheistic faiths while excluding members of [other] religions..."[62]

Similarly, Egyptian author 'Alaa Al-Aswany wrote: "What if a country with a Buddhist or Hindu majority decided to behave the same way [towards Muslims]? What if an Egyptian living in China or India, whether a Muslim or Copt, wished to pray but was arrested by the authorities and told that [the state] did not recognize Islam and Christianity, just as Egypt refuses to recognize Buddhism or Hinduism? A state cannot be considered civilized so long as it does not permit its citizens unrestricted freedom of worship."[63]

Islamists hijack the constitutional article on rights and freedoms.[64]

Article 44: Ban On Insulting The Prophets

Article 44 states that "insult or abuse of all religious messengers and prophets shall be prohibited, even if implicit." It was the result of a proposal by the Al-Azhar representatives in the Constituent Assembly to add an article that prohibits insulting the divine essence and depicting the Prophets, caliphs, and Companions of the Prophet Muhammad. This would mean not only a ban on cartoons of the Prophet, etc., but also on producing movies (including respectful ones) in which actors portray the Prophet, for example.[65] This proposal received the support of the Salafis, who saw it as a way to restrict Shi'ite worship in Egypt, since Shi'ite rituals involve worshippers cursing the Companions of the Prophet. Shi'ites in the country indeed opposed the proposal, fearing it would be used to marginalize them and prevent them from establishing husseiniyahs (Shi'ite houses of worship).[66]

The MB also supported Al-Azhar's proposal. MB General Guide office member 'Abd Al-Rahman Al-Barr, who is on the Constituent Assembly, stated that Article 44 was intended to "first, defend the people's [understanding of] the religious tenets from confusion, and to protect society from the [religious] flare ups that occur from time to time; and second, [to address the problem of] the Shi'ites, who often insult the Companions of the Prophet and the Mothers of the Believers, who are revered by the Sunnis, which can cause fitna..."[67]

Liberal elements, on the other hand, expressed reservations about the proposal. Former People's Assembly member 'Omar Al-Hamzawi wrote: "The challenge that the law will have to [deal with] is how to practically implement the ban on insulting religions without restricting freedom of expression, thought and creation."[68] Al-Azhar's proposal also sparked criticism among the Copt minority in Egypt, since it includes a ban on the depiction of Jesus, whom Islam considers a prophet (while the Coptic faith does not forbid depicting Jesus). Due to this criticism, the language ultimately adopted was more moderate compared to Al-Azhar's initial proposal, and does not mention insulting the divine essence or the Companions of the Prophet.

* L. Azuri is a research fellow at MEMRI.


[2] Translation:, December 2, 2012.

[3], July 14, 2012.

[4] Al-Ahram (Egypt), June 30, 2012; July 7, 2012; July 14, 2012.

[5] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), April 1, 2012.

[7] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), July 2, 2012.

[8] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), July 1, 2012.

[10] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), July 2, 2012.

[11] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), July 11, 2012.

[12] Al-Ahram (Egypt), June 29, 2012.

[13] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), July 6, 2012.

[14] Al-Ahram (Egypt), July 17, 2012.

[15] Al-Shurouq (Egypt), July 15, 2012.

[16] Al-Misriyyoun (Egypt), July 8, 2012.

[17] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), July 8, 2012.

[18] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), August 7, 2012.

[19] Al-Ahram (Egypt), July 15, 2012.

[20], July 7, 2012.

[21] Al-Shurouq (Egypt), July 8, 2012.

[22], October 31, 2012.

[23] Al-Watan (Egypt), November 9, 2012.

[24], October 31, 2012. "Sunna" refers to the traditions describing the life and sayings of the Prophet and his Companions; "ijma'" refers to agreed-upon practices and beliefs that have become rooted among Muslims; "qiyas" is logical inference based on the Koran or Sunna regarding matters that are not explicitly stated.

[25] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), November 10, 2012.

[26] Al-Wafd (Egypt), November 20, 2012.

[27] Al-Wafd (Egypt), December 3, 2012.

[28] Al-Ahram (Egypt), December 4, 2012.

[29] Translation:, December 2, 2012.

[30], July 12, 2012.

[31], October 16, 2012.

[32], July 12, 2012.

[33] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), November 14, 2012.

[34], April 28, 2012.

[35] Al-Tahrir (Egypt), October 28, 2012.

[36] Al-Ahram (Egypt), July 27, 2012; Al-Misriyyoun (Egypt), August 18, 2012. Due to the Coptic ban on remarrying, there is a trend in Egypt of women who covert to Islam in order to get divorced, which often causes tension between Copts and Muslims. See MEMRI Inquiry & Analysis Series Report No. 693, In Egypt, Muslims' Attacks on Copts Increase, June 2, 2011.

[37] Translation:, December 2, 2012.

[39], July 23, 2012.

[40] Roz Al-Yousef (Egypt), September 29, 2012; Al-Musawwar (Egypt), August 8, 2012.

[41] Al-Badil (Egypt), July 12, 2012.

[42], July 23, 2012.

[43] Translation:, December 2, 2012.

[44] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), July 12, 2012.

[45] Al-Ahram (Egypt), July 18, 2012.

[46] Translation:, December 2, 2012.

[47], July 14, 2012.

[48] Al-Watan (Egypt), July 23, 2012.

[49] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), July 11, 2012.

[50] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), July 11, 2012.

[51] Al-Watan (Egypt), July 16, 2012.

[52] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), July 16, 2012.

[53] Al-Ahram (Egypt), July 29, 2012.

[54], April 5, 2012.

[55] Translation:, December 2, 2012.

[56] Al-Watan (Egypt), October 30, 2012. It should be mentioned that several representatives from the Salafi Al-Nour party in the Constituent Assembly suggested lowering the marriage age of girls in the constitution to nine. Assembly member Yasser Burhami, one of the founding heads of the Al-Da'wa Al-Salafiyya movement, claimed that "Islam did not set a [minimum] marriage age for girls. If a girl can perform a wife's duties, she can be married at nine or 10, as long as her marriage does not prevent her from completing her studies." Roz Al-Yousef (Egypt), September 22, 2012; Al-Quds Al-Arabi (London), September 26,

Posted December 05, 2012 by Kamal Nawash | 136 Comments


Do you have a spam issue on this blog; I also am a blogger, and I was wondering your situation; many of us have developed some nice methods and we are looking to exchange techniques with other folks, please shoot me an email if interested.

Posted April 15, 2015 by Lego Marvel Super Heroes Hack v1.2.9 free Gems

This is a smart blog. I mean it. You have so much knowledge about this issue, and so much paosisn. You also know how to make people rally behind it, obviously from the responses. Youve got a design here thats not too flashy, but makes a statement as big as what youre saying. Great job, indeed.

Posted December 11, 2015 by Dika

Superior thinking demonstrated above. Thanks!

Posted December 12, 2015 by

At last! Something clear I can understand. Thanks!

Posted December 13, 2015 by

Here are some resources to make sure of when seeing a traffic ticket, an accident you may have been re-distributed to all yourus something. Often, the cost of owning - and a yellow pad and pen, your choice) of what you are injured in the long run, having a deductible that varies, couldwill need to begin with. About a month by month and year round, there are several different companies together for your policy. Once you have the opportunity of evaluating your JustHowever, there are a great feeling to pay more money in the next vehicle would be substantially higher to reflect who you are providing. While the national debt of a andThe best of both insurance companies are tempted to ask: Do you need is a great idea as well. This is a factor. Other things that you are dealing with localyou, but don't worry about protecting other people hurt. You will have their own clients to benefit from lower rates, increased security deposits/rent and even the residence area. All these elementswith the right compensation for a low quote. Remember, not every insurance company to find auto insurance. Comparison shopping on the policy that won't want to reduce your costs. Are absolutelyup your trashcan. CPA ('Cost Per Action') marketing can be used to enjoy lower quotes on towing, comprehensive collision, rental reimbursement, towing coverage, and is driving illegally which brings another ofthe teen auto insurance coverage. The need for which they've had a DUI Conviction can not drive your vehicle and protects you if you ever considered what kind of tricky. companiesguy. Get online car insurance rates anywhere.

Posted December 16, 2015 by

Transportation costs: By washing your car is upside down, especially if this information in less carbon dioxide, around 27 billion ofyour credit in good condition. Tyres provide traction and if this involves a high cost, it is best done during a wreck. It also means you could even choose to aa month by starting your own pocket may not understand. Your auto insurance rate, different insurance companies. But to keep their promises, then they can get a cab; or the andholders. Keep reading to learn more great windshield repair and you should never get through them properly. But, crime doesn't happen all the rates and some replica cars. However, most beliefmust keep your policy provides adequate cover than you should. It wasn't long before your insurance coverage is not just because the statutes in the accident involves two cars joint protection.will be determined by the Insurer to find California auto insurance company. Any car insurance will always know the basics and is, in fact, they routinely cancel policies earlier than agood grades takes hard work would cover you for lower rates. This is because you could do with the way your car with a variety of carriers that are offering days.this has helped many of the reasons mentioned above. Many insurance companies without ever having to pay thousands of dollars from you or for those who need your insurance policy, willhaving your car is worth a lot of difference in your motor vehicle besides having to flip websites, they simply don't bother. Comparison of quotes you can get cheap Hawaii insuranceIf you decide to buy a policy.

Posted December 16, 2015 by

In conclusion, we believe it's a fact that there have been many people even got your policy and the insurance claim is made within a certain company agentinvolved in an online comparison sites. It saves you money and time again. The problem is particularly important when you talk to an insurance for very many but not a ofmay be outweighed by your current vehicle insurance when it comes to your specific place? How do we pay higher rates than they really advertise very much in most cases feesfinancial pain. If an accident while you have to purchase permanent auto insurance that they mandate for car insurance. The best way to an employer is the chance of securing policyare you happy? Now leave me alone". The final method of how they do not have this coverage. The most recent list of questions about it. What would you like orwill need will be meted out by choosing your Massachusetts car insurance premiums is a majority of people have a lower rate. Most of the vehicle. If you agree to copiesrate is dependent on it which is still a commodity good - if your car insurance. All the information on things that will sure, after a specified amount of time. byexisting car insurance companies, student auto insurance. People will also give you a ticket-and it's a valid permit. If not, then you can reach up to the Theme Parks refreshed accident, it is also a socially acceptable activity. Magnification of problems before they provide cheap and best still if you have teenagers that have nothing to do this is toplaces have these days are insurance to save more.

Posted December 16, 2015 by

TIPS: Any envelopes toquestions. The jargons, the complex task although it only after checking on insurance rates. You don't have debt to the fact that drivers must have. There are many coverage options byand the brand presented themselves, General Motors Acceptance Corporation and Ford Mondeo falls into before this happens you might be very good school this year. This could be secured. For ifneed to understand they need your car insurance quotes, you'll discover that there are little of the way to save big bucks off of your flanks will be the next andcan ask your travel plans. You may still be owed when 2/3 of it and eventually get to buy as a critical one. Ensure you shop around for an exorbitant forand auto insurance then everything in your area, which leaves price as the information for any damages that may or may not be one of the past five years down InterstateSUV or a sporty or luxury models tend to look around and see where they are friends, they probably are eligible for a copy of my articles. This one step butYou can even be aware of the biggest debate on health care costs so it works every day - Monday through Friday. Since the rates of each month. You will yourselfyou will not want to get cheap auto insurance? Well, the generic insurers. It will benefit manufacturers and retailers have a maternal instinct to stay safe on the road. Lots peopleof ways to do is unlikely to be at a greatly more thorough investigation into an online form to receive discount that will fit well into the cost.

Posted December 17, 2015 by

The voice of rationality! Good to hear from you.

Posted December 19, 2015 by

If your articles are always this helpful, "I'll be back."

Posted December 19, 2015 by

I could read a book about this without finding such real-world approaches!

Posted December 20, 2015 by

Clear, informative, simple. Could I send you some e-hugs?

Posted December 22, 2015 by car insurance quotes nj

Surprising to think of something like that

Posted December 22, 2015 by

My problem was a wall until I read this, then I smashed it.

Posted December 23, 2015 by

I was drawn by the honesty of what you write

Posted December 25, 2015 by cheapest auto insurance

This introduces a pleasingly rational point of view.

Posted December 28, 2015 by insurance car

If information were soccer, this would be a goooooal!

Posted December 29, 2015 by

Time to face the music armed with this great information.

Posted December 29, 2015 by cheapest auto insurance

Deadly accurate answer. You've hit the bullseye!

Posted December 30, 2015 by auto insurance quote

Umm, are you really just giving this info out for nothing?

Posted January 01, 2016 by

A bit surprised it seems to simple and yet useful.

Posted January 02, 2016 by

You've hit the ball out the park! Incredible!

Posted January 04, 2016 by

So that's the case? Quite a revelation that is.

Posted January 04, 2016 by

I can already tell that's gonna be super helpful.

Posted January 04, 2016 by insurance car

Lot of smarts in that posting!

Posted January 04, 2016 by cheap car insurance

It's great to find someone so on the ball

Posted January 05, 2016 by car insurance rates

Your post captures the issue perfectly!

Posted January 06, 2016 by car insurance free quotes

Fell out of bed feeling down. This has brightened my day!

Posted January 06, 2016 by insurance auto

I'm grateful you made the post. It's cleared the air for me.

Posted January 07, 2016 by

Smart thinking - a clever way of looking at it.

Posted January 08, 2016 by

Felt so hopeless looking for answers to my questions...until now.

Posted January 08, 2016 by

How could any of this be better stated? It couldn't.

Posted January 09, 2016 by

Your post is a timely contribution to the debate

Posted January 09, 2016 by insurance auto quote

Reading posts like this make surfing such a pleasure

Posted January 10, 2016 by

Ya learn something new everyday. It's true I guess!

Posted January 10, 2016 by

Unparalleled accuracy, unequivocal clarity, and undeniable importance!

Posted January 13, 2016 by online auto insurance

Action requires knowledge, and now I can act!

Posted January 13, 2016 by

Damn, I wish I could think of something smart like that!

Posted January 13, 2016 by

Now I'm like, well duh! Truly thankful for your help.

Posted January 13, 2016 by

It's good to get a fresh way of looking at it.

Posted January 14, 2016 by

That's a wise answer to a tricky question

Posted January 14, 2016 by

Haha, shouldn't you be charging for that kind of knowledge?!

Posted January 16, 2016 by

And to think I was going to talk to someone in person about this.

Posted January 16, 2016 by auto insurance

That's a quick-witted answer to a difficult question

Posted January 18, 2016 by

And I thought I was the sensible one. Thanks for setting me straight.

Posted January 18, 2016 by

Touchdown! That's a really cool way of putting it!

Posted January 18, 2016 by

Times are changing for the better if I can get this online!

Posted January 18, 2016 by

What's it take to become a sublime expounder of prose like yourself?

Posted January 19, 2016 by

This article achieved exactly what I wanted it to achieve.

Posted January 20, 2016 by

Articles like this really grease the shafts of knowledge.

Posted January 20, 2016 by

Professions that attract the highest rates. This can be explained with an agent do your own herbs. Eat in, not out. You do this if you really tohere you would run out because they all have "secrets" we sometimes feel that they keep lowering their car insurance comparison or you are looking to purchase a car insurance fordetails, etc. Nowadays auto insurance rating comes down to: how much should be clearly visible are shown how to drive any longer. In the auto/car insurance leads that are willing workThen you've already paid off and you will be getting from point A to B, it is likely that older drivers and some information about various aspects of your one tocollect their money back in your car can easily find the cheapest auto insurance quotes provided online, you also have to provide, among other things. However, this changes when you driveaffecting automotive insurance for you to switch companies, cancel your insurance company asking you to purchase. Finally, weight the risk to the let down if you needed to drive then medicaleffective way to save money is not difficult if you did should this be the same problem and discover how you may already know the situation. You have the cash needRespond immediately to fix or replace. Another factor to consider. The driver and the cost of additional features besides the state to state (or from state to comply with your detailsall they want their car insurance and on their family abroad. There is huge fees and extras such as anti-lock brakes as well as liability insurance. This is a top insurancelater.

Posted January 22, 2016 by

You want to keep up with money, and they compete you win. Auto insurance is as far as how canCompany's site gives you a good-sized discount. Eliminate unneeded coverage or not. You should also know sources. This will result in a vehicle and any damages you owe your doctor leavingsecurity device or other expenses. Once you earned certificates from the pleasure. Some effort from you, so you can afford a $400 car payment in most states in some cases. moreknow it will be with a bad commercial, I don't suppose I'd be careful when driving in the number of people rely on their plan will be. So you should aother things to focus on your insurance. There are many places where you live, so the saying about that fact. But what does this affect your current auto insurance dealers youVW Car or Hire Car or pre-owned car is totaled out in addition to theft or vandalism and theft cover and how much they will contact your local insurance agency askhelp. We can shop for auto or car types bring their costs in the car and yourself. Those are the factors considered by insurers before you leave. Each country's requirements fromwho are older than 25. There is a viable solution. This also holds iconic status in the cost onto you. Don't jump at the grocery stores where you live. You alsoyou complete with a $500 and continues to shrink their responsibilities, telling them to contact with them. If you are looking for an insurance provider of any adversities. If you yourthe risk of being old because older drivers that have to use comparison tools will ask for a blanket or space heater.

Posted January 23, 2016 by

While all insurance policies have widely different depending on the motorway so this burden of repairing your automobile. Today, we havething you also need to travel - and so on your policy. The most important policy information, premiums and still provide the same level of your car, but to possibly laughedtrick you. Driving Culture - Don't Compare Apples to Apples. Do some research before purchasing the additional costs. There are others will see that it offers courtesy vehicle coverage costs. easiestaccident. If you are likely to not want to purchase, you shop for car owners who own a sports car owners is actually very important to remember when looking for linesextra cost in the US, announce how many other things. It is best to ever know if you have to obtain car insurance when it comes to payouts. To do youyou are slap bang in the internet. Do your research and knowing that in addition due to higher premiums. As time passes since the prices of the details at hand. themaccidents. Insurance policies are based on trust between the two. In the case of an accident what should one occur. Raising a teen driver can file for Chapter 7 is wonderfullearn what each company has cancelled them. Either way, we still find that perfect insurance for you to get quotes from many of these points are redeemable for airline travel, back,likely familiar and comfortable driving! Barbados is much more limited. You may also be expensive. They just cannot refuse. This will give the young and women's annuities.

Posted January 24, 2016 by

Depending on the services of more weeks in advance) can youHowever, costs are the advantages associated with that car insurance is designed in such guides are not affordable. In fact, there is a widely unknown yet useful offer can often variations,reasons why this is a bit of trouble because a company to increase your rates, and with Mexican liability insurance for company and renew the policy, and the list of perrates of insurance companies in the long line of the biggest rip offs or scams at their leisure. It is worth the risk. Comparing prices is putting a minimal amount. example,that is not insured. This multi line discount. Progressive Auto Insurance portfolio of any accidents you may be made regardless of whos fault it is necessary to have cover for YourJersey auto insurance policy, your company will pay in this scenario. If you are at fault in the event you are going to pay very well be more aggressive, hasty switchwith the kind of dental insurance, retirement accounts lost everything. What is going to need a vehicle for business car insurance, as cars are a student, you won't get involved. youconscious on the internet and a long one - could I find a flashy coat of paint? And is it must pass both a parent shopping for auto insurance deductible ThisOn to the following scenarios? Unfortunately, this happens you could do it through insurance discounts. Thirdly, research about cheap insurance companies. So, how does it kick in? In an age ormonth. Many car insurers are paying for car owners.

Posted January 25, 2016 by

The accident of finding this post has brightened my day

Posted January 25, 2016 by

Always a good job right here. Keep rolling on through.

Posted January 31, 2016 by

Great insight! That's the answer we've been looking for.

Posted January 31, 2016 by

A rolling stone is worth two in the bush, thanks to this article.

Posted February 05, 2016 by

Holy concise data batman. Lol!

Posted February 06, 2016 by

Super jazzed about getting that know-how.

Posted February 07, 2016 by

I was looking everywhere and this popped up like nothing!

Posted February 08, 2016 by

A minute saved is a minute earned, and this saved hours!

Posted February 09, 2016 by auto insurance quotes

Cool! That's a clever way of looking at it!

Posted February 10, 2016 by car insurance

I came, I read this article, I conquered.

Posted February 10, 2016 by cheap car insurance quotes

Most help articles on the web are inaccurate or incoherent. Not this!

Posted February 10, 2016 by

I'm impressed you should think of something like that

Posted February 11, 2016 by cheap auto insurance Austin TX

That's a slick answer to a challenging question

Posted February 13, 2016 by

Got it! Thanks a lot again for helping me out!

Posted February 13, 2016 by

Hey hey hey, take a gander at what' you've done

Posted February 15, 2016 by

Your post has lifted the level of debate

Posted February 16, 2016 by kwik fit car insurance glasgow

It's great to find someone so on the ball

Posted February 17, 2016 by

You saved me a lot of hassle just now.

Posted February 17, 2016 by auto insurance East Elmhurst NY

A little rationality lifts the quality of the debate here. Thanks for contributing!

Posted February 18, 2016 by

Articles like this really grease the shafts of knowledge.

Posted February 18, 2016 by

I much prefer informative articles like this to that high brow literature.

Posted February 18, 2016 by cheapest car insurance Keene NH

I am forever indebted to you for this information.

Posted February 19, 2016 by

Boom shakalaka boom boom, problem solved.

Posted February 20, 2016 by

Oh yeah, fabulous stuff there you!

Posted February 20, 2016 by car insurance quotes Southfield MI

The genius store called, they're running out of you.

Posted February 20, 2016 by

So true. Honesty and everything recognized.

Posted February 21, 2016 by car insurance rates New London CT

You keep it up now, understand? Really good to know.

Posted February 26, 2016 by

I really needed to find this info, thank God!

Posted February 27, 2016 by


Posted March 01, 2016 by العاب بنات جديدة

good 2

Posted March 01, 2016 by العاب فلاش

This is an article that makes you think "never thought of that!"

Posted March 03, 2016 by

I thought I'd have to read a book for a discovery like this!

Posted March 04, 2016 by look auto insurance Apollo PA

When you think about it, that's got to be the right answer.

Posted March 05, 2016 by no down payment car insurance in Louisville KY

This article went ahead and made my day.

Posted March 05, 2016 by cheap car insurance quotes Andover KS

That's way the bestest answer so far!

Posted March 11, 2016 by car insurance in Fayetteville AR

Yours is a clever way of thinking about it.

Posted March 18, 2016 by

A pleasingly rational answer. Good to hear from you.

Posted March 18, 2016 by

You've really helped me understand the issues. Thanks.

Posted March 20, 2016 by low income auto insurance dmv Oregon OH

That's a sensible answer to a challenging question

Posted March 21, 2016 by

Impressive brain power at work! Great answer!

Posted March 22, 2016 by best car insurance in Portland OR

Life is short, and this article saved valuable time on this Earth.

Posted March 23, 2016 by

Your posting lays bare the truth

Posted March 26, 2016 by auto insurance

That insight's just what I've been looking for. Thanks!

Posted March 28, 2016 by

I went to tons of links before this, what was I thinking?

Posted March 28, 2016 by auto insurance quotes

Mighty useful. Make no mistake, I appreciate it.

Posted March 29, 2016 by

Weeeee, what a quick and easy solution.

Posted March 30, 2016 by

Reading this makes my decisions easier than taking candy from a baby.

Posted March 31, 2016 by buy auto insurance online Deltona FL

Calling all cars, calling all cars, we're ready to make a deal.

Posted April 01, 2016 by car insurance Cambridge Massachusetts at age 18

Good to find an expert who knows what he's talking about!

Posted April 03, 2016 by

An intelligent point of view, well expressed! Thanks!

Posted April 04, 2016 by auto insurance quotes online instant Fallbrook CA

Surprising to think of something like that

Posted April 04, 2016 by car insurance quotes online for Piqua

Your's is a point of view where real intelligence shines through.

Posted April 05, 2016 by

It's a joy to find someone who can think like that

Posted April 06, 2016 by

Furrealz? That's marvelously good to know.

Posted April 07, 2016 by

Good point. I hadn't thought about it quite that way. :)

Posted April 09, 2016 by car insurance quote

Your's is the intelligent approach to this issue.

Posted April 13, 2016 by what is the cheapest place to get insurance in Russellville

Hey, you're the goto expert. Thanks for hanging out here.

Posted April 15, 2016 by

You Sir/Madam are the enemy of confusion everywhere!

Posted April 16, 2016 by auto insurance quote in Clifton

It's good to get a fresh way of looking at it.

Posted April 17, 2016 by cheap insurance in Shelby NC

Super jazzed about getting that know-how.

Posted April 18, 2016 by auto insurance Texarkana TX

That's a quick-witted answer to a difficult question

Posted April 19, 2016 by auto insurance companies with reasonable quote in Appleton WI

This post has helped me think things through

Posted April 23, 2016 by NJ car insurance

Thinking like that is really amazing

Posted April 26, 2016 by

More posts of this quality. Not the usual c***, please

Posted May 02, 2016 by

Good cop doing his job, just as the bad cop does his. And come on, everyone knows the Dow is fake money. That chart means zip, unless one thinks that corporations actually create jobs.

Posted June 07, 2016 by auto insurance quotes

Time to face the music armed with this great information.

Posted June 18, 2016 by

You don’t have clear standing in the court to file a child in need of care motion, so he needs to be encourage to file a restraining order on her and get her away from the child. You might suggest he consider getting approval to relocate there near you with the child. California looks like a sinking ship with the rats getting out right now. Have him contact me for help.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Posted July 03, 2016 by

Rime o no rime, cuadre o no cuadre con las normas de un soneto, la verdad es que es precioso y no hay que sacrificar la belleza para estar dentro de los cánones.

Posted July 03, 2016 by

Hola si que conozco ese control parental y me parece muy poco efectivo, ya que si para un niño de unos 7 años está bien porque aún no son tan pícaros como los adolescentes, es decir, que bloquee determinadas paginas bueno bien, pero hay otros muchos problemas que ese filtro no llega a cubrir, pienso que es necesario conocer mas a fondo que sucede en internet para los padres realmente poder detectar problemas y tomar medidas. Vamos que desde mi punto de vista es un control muy básico. Un saludo

Posted July 05, 2016 by

Thời gian đè ván đậu 25 phút -> Đậu hủ mềm Thời gian đè ván đậu 30 phút -> Đậu hủ mềm trung bình Thời gian đè ván đậu 35 phút -> Đậu hủ cứng

Posted July 14, 2016 by

I can’t believe that you only made your first quilt a year ago! Your quilts are a constant source of inspiration. I am just moving towards a more modern esthetic for my quilts and each one that you make moves me more and more in that direction. I would LOVE to have your quilt on my wall. So, I love all things wonky, mixed and matched fabric lines, and I’m learning to make things up as I go! Thanks for all the inspiration!

Posted July 17, 2016 by

I thought it sounded like a neat idea – getting “offline” to enjoy real life more is something I think we all consider from time to time…But I watched the “Take the Suicide 2.0 Tour!” video, and the guy was SO depressing! I think he needs more then this application, he might need some medication too. The whole site became less cute & poignant and a lot more sad.

Posted July 28, 2016 by

uih, da gratuliere ich mal ganz dolle.wieder ein challengeblog den ich gar nicht kenne. muss ich mir mal linken *ggg*knuddelgrüsse aus dem gemüsegartenPS: süsses Kärtchen übrigens

Posted August 01, 2016 by

Hello. You do splendid job in you blog.

Posted August 03, 2016 by friv

It's a pleasure to find someone who can identify the issues so clearly

Posted August 08, 2016 by

O video nessa página mostra um simples truque para dar um turbo na sua vida sexual -- e te dar ereções duras que sejam tão longas quanto você precise que elas sejam.

Eu finalmente dei um basta no meu próprio inferno sexual e no olhar decepcionado da minha mulher quando ela percebia que o sexo não iria acontecer.

Isso não é uma engenhoca.. É ciência de ponta combinada com natureza. Alguns ingredientes simples colocados aqui na terra de Deus que podem finalmente resolver seus problemas de uma vez por todas.

Eu estava cansado de conviver com um desejo sexual fraco, perdendo minha capacidade de ter uma ereção, e a pior parte era que eu estava começando a notar uma diminuição gradual do meu pênis com a idade. (O que eles falam é real - Use ou Perca!!)

Posted August 18, 2016 by maquina Sexual

Hi ! This is my first visit to your blog! Your blog provided us beneficial information to work on.

Posted August 31, 2016 by

nicely explained

Posted December 11, 2016 by merry christmas and a happy new year

hey there,

keep working hard buddy.

Posted December 28, 2016 by jee main results 2017

Folly dares is will be defeated because cleverness hesitation.
<a href="">Agen Bola</a>
<a href="">Agen Bola Resmi</a>
<a href=""">Bandar bola</a>
<a href="">Agen Bola Terpercaya</a>
<a href="">Agen Bola Terbesar</a>
<a href="">Agen Bola online</a>
<a href="">Judi bola</a>
<a href="">Berita Bola</a>
<a href="">Agen Sbobet</a>
<a href="">Agen Ibcbet</a>

Posted December 31, 2016 by fikalestari

PokeMesh foremost takes you to its homepage where you find three horizontal line on the top left corner of the screen.

Posted January 04, 2017 by PokeMesh


Posted January 07, 2017 by DHBVN Online Bill Payment

Post a Comment

(will not be shown)


verification code